:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(canada, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is cold)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(quebec, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is humid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alaska, is cold)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child