winnipeg: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.54
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, quebec
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
be hotter in summer 0.79
is cool 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(city, is cool)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(city, be hotter in summer)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, is cool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is hot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(winnipeg, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(winnipeg, is cool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is cool)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is cool)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(winnipeg, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is cool)