wisconsin: is community property state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is community property state 1.00
has state state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is community property state)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is community property state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)