wolf: be animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings husky
Weight: 0.46
, dingo
Weight: 0.46
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, elk
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be animals 1.00
eat animals 0.91
go after animals 0.91
react to animals 0.87
be pets 0.87
be different species from dogs 0.87
eat large animals 0.87
is dogs 0.85
has state pets 0.85
is good pets 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wolf, be animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wolf, be animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(predator, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, eat animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(predator, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dingo, be pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(wolf, be animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(wolf, be animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dingo, be pets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dingo, be pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(wolf, be animals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wolf, react to animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(wolf, react to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wolf, react to animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wolf, react to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wolf, be animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dingo, be pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(wolf, be animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat animals)