wombat: have backwards pouches

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.61 , marsupial Weight: 0.56 , species Weight: 0.55 , wildlife Weight: 0.51 , thing Weight: 0.45
Siblings	cassowary Weight: 0.36 , hedgehog Weight: 0.35 , koala Weight: 0.35 , dingo Weight: 0.35 , wallaby Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have backwards pouches	1.00
have back to pouches	0.94
have back to front pouches	0.92
have backwards pouch	0.92
has physical part pouches	0.90
has pouch	0.84
has physical part pouch	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(marsupial, has pouch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(marsupial, has pouch)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has physical part pouches)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has physical part pouch)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has pouch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(marsupial, has pouch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(wallaby, has physical part pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(wombat, has physical part pouches)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouch)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to front pouches)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(wombat, has physical part pouches)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(wombat, has physical part pouches)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wombat, has physical part pouches)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to front pouches)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(wombat, have backwards pouch)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(wombat, has pouch)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouch)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouch)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(wombat, have back to front pouches)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(wombat, has pouch)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(wombat, have back to front pouches)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(wombat, has pouch)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wombat, has pouch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(marsupial, has pouch)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouches)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(marsupial, has pouch)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouches)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouch)