wood: be considered renewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered renewable resource 1.00
is renewable resource 0.98
be classified as renewable resource 0.96
be described as renewable resource 0.96
be described as renewable energy resource 0.96
be considered renewable 0.95
be described as non renewable resource 0.94
be classified as non renewable resource 0.94
is renewable 0.92
is renewable energy 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(timber, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wood, is renewable resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wood, is renewable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(wood, is renewable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wood, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)