wood: be good for furniture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for furniture 1.00
be used for furniture 0.96
made into furniture 0.93
be good for building 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wood, be good for furniture)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wood, made into furniture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wood, made into furniture)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wood, made into furniture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wood, made into furniture)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wood, be used for furniture)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wood, be used for furniture)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wood, be used for furniture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used for furniture)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wood, be good for building)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wood, be good for furniture)