wood: be good for building

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for building 1.00
be used building 0.91
build house 0.81
be good making 0.77
be good for furniture 0.76
has quality good 0.76
be used in construction 0.75
be bad for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fence, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fence, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(steel, be used building)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(steel, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(timber, be used in construction)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(steel, be used in construction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(steel, be used building)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(steel, be used building)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(steel, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(steel, be used in construction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(timber, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(timber, be used in construction)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(timber, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(timber, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(steel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(steel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(steel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wood, be good for building)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wood, be used building)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wood, be used building)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wood, be used building)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used building)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(wood, build house)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wood, build house)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(wood, build house)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wood, build house)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wood, be used in construction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wood, be good making)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wood, be good for furniture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wood, be used in construction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wood, be used in construction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wood, be good making)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wood, be good making)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wood, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(wood, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wood, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wood, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good making)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fence, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(timber, be used in construction)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(steel, be used in construction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steel, be used building)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(steel, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(timber, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(steel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fence, has quality good)