wood: be used in construction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in construction 1.00
be used building 0.83
be good for building 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(steel, be used building)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(timber, be used in construction)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(steel, be used in construction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(steel, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(steel, be used in construction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(timber, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(timber, be used in construction)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(steel, be used building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(steel, be used building)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wood, be used in construction)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used building)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wood, be used building)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wood, be used building)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wood, be used building)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wood, be good for building)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wood, be used in construction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(timber, be used in construction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(steel, be used in construction)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steel, be used building)