wood: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98
be good insulator of heat 0.96
be insulator of heat 0.94
be good insulators of electricity 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(timber, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(timber, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(timber, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wood, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulator of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wood, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(timber, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good insulator)