wood: be insulator of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be insulator of heat 1.00
be good insulator of heat 0.99
is insulator 0.95
is good insulator 0.94
be good insulators of electricity 0.83
be bad conductor of heat 0.80
be good conductor of heat 0.80
be better conductor of heat 0.79
be useful to heat 0.78
be poor conductor of heat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(timber, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(timber, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(timber, is good insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wood, be insulator of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wood, is good insulator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wood, is good insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wood, is good insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good insulator)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wood, be useful to heat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(wood, be useful to heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wood, be useful to heat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wood, be insulator of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(timber, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good insulator)