wood: be useful to heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to heat 1.00
give off heat 0.82
be good insulator of heat 0.80
be insulator of heat 0.78
be good conductor of heat 0.77
be better conductor of heat 0.77
be bad conductor of heat 0.77
expand with heat 0.76
expand in heat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(wood, be useful to heat)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wood, expand with heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wood, expand with heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wood, expand in heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wood, expand in heat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wood, expand with heat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wood, expand in heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wood, be insulator of heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulator of heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wood, expand in heat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wood, expand with heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wood, be useful to heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wood, be useful to heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)