worker: were affected by specialization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were affected by specialization 1.00
were affected in 1920s 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by specialization)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by specialization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, were affected by specialization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by specialization)