worker: were going during 1800s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were going during 1800s 1.00
were going on strike 0.81
were affected in 1920s 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(worker, were going during 1800s)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(worker, were going on strike)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(worker, were going on strike)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(worker, were going on strike)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(worker, were going on strike)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(worker, were going during 1800s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(worker, were going during 1800s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(worker, were going during 1800s)