writing: was different than earlier pictographic writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different than earlier pictographic writing 1.00
was different than pictographic writing 0.98
was different than earlier writing 0.89
was different than writing 0.88
be different writing 0.84
be different from roman writing 0.82
be different writing at school 0.81
be writing 0.79
be different from kinds writing 0.79
using composition writing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(writing, be different writing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(writing, be different writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(writing, be different from roman writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(writing, be different writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(writing, be writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(writing, using composition writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, be different writing at school)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(writing, be writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(writing, be writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(writing, using composition writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(writing, using composition writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, be different from roman writing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, be different from roman writing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, be different writing at school)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(writing, be different writing at school)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(writing, be different from roman writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, be different writing at school)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(writing, be different writing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(writing, be writing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(writing, using composition writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(writing, was different than earlier pictographic writing)