writing: was important in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in past 1.00
was important in mesopotamia 0.86
was important for mesopotamians 0.86
was important to sumerians 0.84
was important to mayans 0.84
was important to mesopotamia 0.84
be important in history 0.80
be important to history 0.78
was affected during modern time period 0.78
is down important 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important in past)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mayans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mayans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to mayans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, be important in history)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, be important in history)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, be important to history)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(writing, was affected during modern time period)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(writing, was affected during modern time period)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(writing, is down important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, be important to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(writing, be important in history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(writing, is down important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(writing, was affected during modern time period)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(writing, be important to history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(writing, is down important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mayans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(writing, be important in history)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(writing, be important to history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was affected during modern time period)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(writing, is down important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important in past)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important in past)