yak: have broad hooves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, cattle
Weight: 0.42
, world
Weight: 0.36
Siblings mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, llama
Weight: 0.35
, cape buffalo
Weight: 0.34
, goat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have broad hooves 1.00
has physical part hooves 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(yak, have broad hooves)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(yak, has physical part hooves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(yak, has physical part hooves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(yak, has physical part hooves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(yak, has physical part hooves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(yak, have broad hooves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(yak, have broad hooves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(yak, have broad hooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)