youth: become drug dealers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.60
, young people
Weight: 0.59
, club
Weight: 0.59
Siblings boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, troop
Weight: 0.46
, arsonist
Weight: 0.43
, young man
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
become drug dealers 1.00
use drugs 0.79
get involved with drugs 0.77
take drugs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(young people, take drugs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(youth, become drug dealers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(young people, take drugs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(young people, take drugs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(young people, take drugs)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(youth, become drug dealers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(youth, become drug dealers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(youth, take drugs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(youth, take drugs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(youth, take drugs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(youth, take drugs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(youth, use drugs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(youth, become drug dealers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(youth, become drug dealers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(young people, take drugs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(youth, become drug dealers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(young people, take drugs)