zimbabwe: be considered as country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as country 1.00
be considered country 0.98
be considered as developing country 0.91
be considered developing country 0.88
is country 0.86
be considered beautiful country 0.85
be considered countries 0.85
is world country 0.83
is non country 0.82
is third world country 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(united states, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(united states, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(united states, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is third world country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is world country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(malta, is country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(united states, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(nigeria, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(malta, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(malta, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(zambia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zambia, is country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(zambia, is world country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(zambia, is world country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(zambia, is third world country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(zambia, is third world country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is non country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered beautiful country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is third world country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is non country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is non country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is non country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is third world country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is world country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered beautiful country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is third world country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered beautiful country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered beautiful country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is third world country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(united states, is country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nigeria, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(malta, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(zambia, is country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zambia, is world country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zambia, is third world country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(united states, is country)