zimbabwe: be considered poorest countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered poorest countries 1.00
be considered countries 0.85
is poor country 0.82
is impoverished 0.82
be considered developing country 0.80
be considered as developing country 0.79
be in poverty 0.77
is poor 0.77
be considered country 0.77
have poverty 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(united states, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(united states, be in poverty)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in poverty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ethiopia, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ethiopia, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ethiopia, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ethiopia, have poverty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(united states, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ethiopia, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ethiopia, is poor country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ethiopia, have poverty)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ethiopia, have poverty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(ethiopia, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ethiopia, be in poverty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zambia, be in poverty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ethiopia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ethiopia, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(nigeria, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(nigeria, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nigeria, be in poverty)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zambia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nigeria, is poor)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have poverty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have poverty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, have poverty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, be considered as developing country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered countries)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(united states, be in poverty)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ethiopia, is poor country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ethiopia, be in poverty)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ethiopia, have poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(zambia, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nigeria, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ethiopia, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nigeria, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(nigeria, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(united states, be in poverty)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(zimbabwe, be considered poorest countries)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)