zimbabwe: is failed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is failed 1.00
is failed state 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is failed state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is failed state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is failed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is failed state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is failed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nigeria, is failed state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(central african republic, is failed state)