zip code: were originally implemented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents code
Weight: 0.80
, variable
Weight: 0.66
, identifier
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.62
Siblings password
Weight: 0.34
, line item
Weight: 0.33
, software
Weight: 0.33
, manila folder
Weight: 0.33
, tag
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were originally implemented 1.00
were implemented 0.92
were originally created 0.88
be developed 0.75
were created 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(code, were originally created)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(code, were created)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(code, were originally created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(code, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(code, were originally created)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(code, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(code, were originally created)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(code, were created)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(software, be developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(software, be developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(zip code, were originally implemented)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(zip code, were implemented)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(zip code, were implemented)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(zip code, were implemented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were implemented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(code, were created)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(code, were originally created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(software, be developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(code, were originally created)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(zip code, were originally implemented)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(code, were created)