zoo: be bad for world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for world 1.00
be good for animails 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be considered bad 0.81
be bad for children 0.78
is bad news 0.77
has quality good 0.76
be good for economy 0.76
CAN can bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(museum, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(museum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(museum, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aquarium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(aquarium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aquarium, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for world)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for children)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for children)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(zoo, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for children)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for children)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(zoo, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zoo, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(zoo, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(zoo, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zoo, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(zoo, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(aquarium, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(museum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aquarium, has quality good)