zoo: be different from zoos in 1860s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from zoos in 1860s 1.00
be different from zoos 1.00
is zoos 0.96
be called zoos 0.96
be amimal kept in zoos 0.93
be good for pandas 0.76
help tigers 0.75
get rid of elephants 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(zoo, be amimal kept in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(zoo, be amimal kept in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(zoo, be amimal kept in zoos)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for pandas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(zoo, help tigers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(zoo, help tigers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be amimal kept in zoos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(zoo, help tigers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for pandas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for pandas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for pandas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(zoo, help tigers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)