zoo: be good for pandas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for pandas 1.00
help tigers 0.78
be different from zoos in 1860s 0.76
be different from zoos 0.76
is zoos 0.76
be called zoos 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for pandas)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(zoo, help tigers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(zoo, help tigers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(zoo, help tigers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be different from zoos in 1860s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(zoo, help tigers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for pandas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(zoo, be good for pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for pandas)