zoo: do more harm than good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
do more harm than good 1.00
provide more good than harm 0.95
be good for animails 0.79
be better than wild 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, do more harm than good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zoo, provide more good than harm)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(zoo, provide more good than harm)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be better than wild)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(zoo, provide more good than harm)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(zoo, provide more good than harm)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(zoo, be better than wild)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(zoo, be better than wild)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(zoo, be better than wild)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(zoo, do more harm than good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zoo, do more harm than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(zoo, do more harm than good)