abc: be better than costing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, radio station
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cnn
Weight: 0.35
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, smallville
Weight: 0.34
, simpsons
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than costing 1.00
be better than traditional costing 0.95
be different from costing system 0.93
be different from traditional costing system 0.89
cost more accurate 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(abc, be better than costing)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(abc, be different from costing system)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from costing system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(abc, be different from costing system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(abc, be different from costing system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(abc, cost more accurate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(abc, cost more accurate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(abc, cost more accurate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than costing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(abc, be better than costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(abc, be better than costing)