abc: cost more accurate

Property	Similarity
cost more accurate	1.00
cost accurate	0.99
is more accurate	0.94
is accurate	0.91
be better than costing	0.79
be better than traditional costing	0.78
be different from costing system	0.76
be different from traditional costing system	0.75

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(abc, cost accurate)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(abc, is more accurate)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(abc, is accurate)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(abc, cost accurate)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(abc, is more accurate)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than costing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from costing system)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(abc, is more accurate)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(abc, is accurate)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(abc, be different from costing system)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(abc, cost accurate)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(abc, is more accurate)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(abc, be different from costing system)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(abc, be better than costing)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(abc, be different from costing system)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(abc, cost accurate)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(abc, be better than costing)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(abc, be better than costing)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(abc, is accurate)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(abc, cost more accurate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(abc, is accurate)

Parents	channel Weight: 0.63 , tv show Weight: 0.62 , radio station Weight: 0.58 , corporation Weight: 0.58 , company Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cnn Weight: 0.35 , kate Weight: 0.35 , sherlock holmes Weight: 0.35 , smallville Weight: 0.34 , simpsons Weight: 0.34

abc: cost more accurate

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible