abstraction: be used in computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.59
, principle
Weight: 0.58
, work
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, idea
Weight: 0.54
Siblings monad
Weight: 0.41
, formalism
Weight: 0.33
, singularity
Weight: 0.33
, duality
Weight: 0.33
, logic
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in computer science 1.00
be important in computer science 0.97
be in science 0.89
is science 0.88
be considered science 0.86
be defined in science 0.80
was done before computers 0.79
be in science meet 0.78
be required by sciences 0.77
be in physics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(work, was done before computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(work, be defined in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(idea, be in science meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(idea, be in science meet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(concept, be in physics)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(work, be defined in science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(work, was done before computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(work, be defined in science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(work, was done before computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(idea, be in science meet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(concept, be in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(logic, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(logic, be required by sciences)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(work, be defined in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(work, was done before computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(idea, be in science meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(logic, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(logic, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(logic, is science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(logic, be required by sciences) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(logic, be required by sciences)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(logic, be important in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(logic, be important in computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(abstraction, be used in computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(abstraction, be important in computer science)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(abstraction, be important in computer science)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be important in computer science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(abstraction, be important in computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(work, be defined in science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(work, was done before computers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(idea, be in science meet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(logic, be important in computer science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(logic, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(logic, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(logic, be required by sciences)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(work, be defined in science)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(idea, be in science meet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(abstraction, be used in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(work, was done before computers)