accuracy: be important in journalism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.68
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.34
, speed
Weight: 0.34
, consistency
Weight: 0.34
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in journalism 1.00
be important in media writing 0.81
be important in science 0.76
be important in writing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(consistency, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in writing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in science)