accuracy: be important in writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.68
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.34
, speed
Weight: 0.34
, consistency
Weight: 0.34
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in writing 1.00
be important in media writing 0.90
be important at work 0.78
be important to intps 0.76
be important in journalism 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in writing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important at work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important at work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important at work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in journalism)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in journalism)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in media writing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in journalism)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in journalism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)