acrylic: be better than glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than glass 1.00
be considered better than glass 0.97
be more expensive than glass 0.93
be better than wood 0.83
be better than plywood 0.76
is plastic good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is plastic good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(acrylic, is plastic good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is plastic good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(acrylic, is plastic good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)