acupuncture: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.66
, modality
Weight: 0.65
, medicine
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
, practice
Weight: 0.63
Siblings acupressure
Weight: 0.50
, moxibustion
Weight: 0.48
, reflexology
Weight: 0.36
, chiropractic
Weight: 0.35
, massage
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
have taste bad 0.82
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
be good for health 0.77
be good for business 0.76
feel good 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(medicine, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(medicine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(medicine, go bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(medicine, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(medicine, taste bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(medicine, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(medicine, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(medicine, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medicine, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(medicine, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(medicine, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(medicine, taste bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupressure, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(massage, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acupressure, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(medicine, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(medicine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(medicine, go bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(medicine, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupressure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(acupressure, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(massage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reflexology, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chiropractic, feel good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(acupressure, feel good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(acupressure, feel good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(reflexology, feel good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(reflexology, feel good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(massage, feel good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(massage, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(massage, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(acupuncture, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acupuncture, feel good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(acupuncture, feel good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(medicine, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medicine, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(medicine, go bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(medicine, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chiropractic, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(acupressure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(reflexology, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(massage, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(acupressure, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(massage, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reflexology, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(massage, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(medicine, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medicine, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(medicine, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(medicine, go bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)