chiropractic: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, health
Weight: 0.57
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.34
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, massage
Weight: 0.34
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
has quality system 0.82
quality of life 0.79
be related quality of life important 0.79
be related quality of life 0.78
be good for health 0.77
feel good 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(health, be related quality of life important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(health, quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(health, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(health, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(health, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(health, quality of life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(health, be related quality of life important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(health, be related quality of life important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(health, quality of life)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(massage, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(health, be related quality of life important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(health, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(health, quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(massage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reflexology, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(reflexology, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(reflexology, feel good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(massage, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(massage, feel good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(massage, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(massage, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chiropractic, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chiropractic, feel good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chiropractic, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, feel good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(health, has quality system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(health, quality of life)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(health, be related quality of life important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acupuncture, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(massage, be good for health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reflexology, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(reflexology, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(massage, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(massage, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(health, has quality system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(health, quality of life)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(health, be related quality of life important)