health: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.64
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mental health problem
Weight: 0.73
, obesity
Weight: 0.70
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.69
, vaccination
Weight: 0.68
, nutrition
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality system 0.84
good for optimal sporting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(health, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nutrition, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(health, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(health, has quality system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(health, has quality system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(health, has quality system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nutrition, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(health, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)