aerosol: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.60
, particle
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hair spray
Weight: 0.67
, dust
Weight: 0.65
, aerosol can
Weight: 0.37
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.35
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be important to earth 's climate 0.78
cool climate 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(aerosol, cool climate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(aerosol, cool climate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(aerosol, cool climate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, cool climate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality bad)