agenda: set important in policy cycle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.63
, forum
Weight: 0.34
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, manifesto
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
set important in policy cycle 1.00
cycle 0.82
set important in cbt 0.81
set important in 0.81
set theory important 0.78
have important to ecosystem cycles 0.76
go through cycles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(matter, cycle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(matter, cycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(matter, cycle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(matter, cycle)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(agenda, set theory important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(agenda, set theory important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(agenda, set theory important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set theory important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(matter, cycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(matter, cycle)