agenda: set important in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.63
, forum
Weight: 0.34
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, manifesto
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
set important in cbt 1.00
set important in 1.00
set theory important 0.84
set important in policy cycle 0.81
set important in negotiation 0.79
be important to gilgamesh 0.79
be important 2063 0.79
be important 21 0.79
is conveniens important 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(forum, is conveniens important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(forum, is conveniens important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(forum, is conveniens important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set theory important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(agenda, be important 21)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(agenda, be important 2063)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in negotiation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(agenda, be important 21)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(agenda, set theory important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(agenda, be important 2063)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in negotiation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(agenda, be important 21)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(agenda, set theory important)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(agenda, set theory important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(agenda, be important 2063)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in negotiation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in negotiation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(agenda, be important 21)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agenda, be important 2063)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(forum, is conveniens important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(agenda, set important in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)