aging: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
affect change 0.83
be related to change 0.81
be with climate changes 0.78
cause changes 0.77
change body 0.77
were changed by revolution 0.77
be related to social change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aging, has quality change)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, cause changes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aging, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(factor, cause changes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, cause changes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(aging, has quality change)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, cause changes)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(aging, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(aging, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(aging, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(aging, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(aging, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(aging, change body)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(aging, change body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aging, change body)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(aging, change body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aging, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(factor, cause changes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(factor, cause changes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(aging, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)