aid: be do people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wetsuit
Weight: 0.42
, sextant
Weight: 0.36
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.36
, grant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear war
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be do people 1.00
do 0.91
affect other people 0.85
affect people 0.85
cause people 0.83
were helpful to people 0.81
kill people 0.81
going with women 0.80
were helpful to early people 0.79
end up going with women 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(aid, be do people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(aid, be do people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(grant, end up going with women)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(grant, going with women)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wetsuit, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aid, be do people)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aid, be do people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wetsuit, do)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetsuit, do)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(grant, going with women)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grant, going with women)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(grant, end up going with women)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(grant, end up going with women)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(aid, be do people)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(aid, kill people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(aid, kill people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(aid, kill people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, affect other people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(aid, cause people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(aid, cause people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(aid, cause people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(aid, cause people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(aid, kill people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(aid, affect other people)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aid, affect other people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aid, affect other people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(aid, be do people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wetsuit, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(grant, going with women)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grant, end up going with women)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(aid, be do people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)