aid: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wetsuit
Weight: 0.42
, sextant
Weight: 0.36
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.36
, grant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear war
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be of quality 0.86
has quality use 0.86
has quality making 0.83
be of high quality 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
was good 0.81
has quality cost 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aid, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aid, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aid, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetsuit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aid, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aid, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aid, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetsuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wetsuit, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grant, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(aid, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aid, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(aid, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aid, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aid, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wetsuit, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)