algebra: be related to medical technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, high school
Weight: 0.56
, study
Weight: 0.56
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, quaternion
Weight: 0.39
, calculus
Weight: 0.34
, school district
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to medical technology 1.00
be related to technology 0.92
be used in medical field 0.85
be related 0.79
be used in medicine 0.76
be important in computer science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(class, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(study, be related to technology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(class, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(class, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in medical field)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(class, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be used in medical field)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in medical field)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(calculus, be related)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(calculus, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(algebra, be related to technology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(algebra, be used in medical field)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in medical field)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(algebra, be used in medical field)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(algebra, be related to technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(algebra, be used in medical field)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(algebra, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(algebra, be used in medicine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(algebra, be used in medicine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(algebra, be used in medicine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used in medicine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(algebra, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(algebra, be important in computer science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(algebra, be related)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(algebra, be important in computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(class, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in medical field)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(class, be related)