algebra: be related to technology

Related concepts

Parents	course Weight: 0.59 , class Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.56 , high school Weight: 0.56 , study Weight: 0.56
Siblings	linear algebra Weight: 0.64 , quaternion Weight: 0.39 , calculus Weight: 0.34 , school district Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be related to technology	1.00
be related to medical technology	0.92
be related	0.83
be important in computer science	0.76
be useful in business management	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(class, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(algebra, be related to technology)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(study, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(algebra, be related to technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(study, be related to technology)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(class, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(class, be related)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be useful in business management)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(study, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to technology)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(class, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(calculus, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(calculus, be related)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(linear algebra, be important in computer science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(linear algebra, be useful in business management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(linear algebra, be useful in business management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(algebra, be related to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(algebra, be related to medical technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to medical technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(algebra, be related)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(algebra, be related to medical technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(algebra, be related to medical technology)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(algebra, be important in computer science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be useful in business management)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(algebra, be useful in business management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be important in computer science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(algebra, be related)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(algebra, be useful in business management)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(algebra, be important in computer science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(algebra, be related)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(algebra, be important in computer science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(algebra, be useful in business management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(algebra, be related to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(class, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(calculus, be related)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(linear algebra, be important in computer science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(linear algebra, be useful in business management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(algebra, be related to technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(class, be related)