algorithm: be important in programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in programming 1.00
be important for programming 0.99
be used in programming 0.96
work in programming 0.95
be used in computer programming 0.89
be as important as content 0.77
be as important as content itself 0.75
be as important as content in website development 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(method, be used in programming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content itself)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(algorithm, work in programming)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used in computer programming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)