method: be used in programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in programming 1.00
be important in programming 0.96
work in programming 0.95
be important for programming 0.95
be used in computer programming 0.93
be needed in computer networks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used in computer programming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(method, be used in programming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(algorithm, be important for programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important for programming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(method, be used in programming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important for programming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)