standard: be needed in computer networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in computer networks 1.00
be necessary for networks 0.92
be needed in data communication 0.80
be needed in networking 0.79
be important for internet protocols 0.78
be important in data communication 0.76
be used in programming 0.76
be important for network interface card connectors 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(method, be used in programming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for network interface card connectors)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for network interface card connectors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(standard, be important for network interface card connectors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(standard, be important for network interface card connectors)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(standard, be important in data communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)