standard: be needed in data communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in data communication 1.00
be important in data communication 0.97
be necessary in study of communication 0.88
be important in communications 0.82
be needed in computer networks 0.80
be needed in networking 0.79
be important for internet protocols 0.77
be necessary for networks 0.77
is needed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quality, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(guideline, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(guideline, is needed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(guideline, is needed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(quality, is needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(standard, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(standard, is needed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(standard, is needed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(standard, is needed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(standard, be important in communications)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(guideline, is needed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(quality, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)