standard: be important in communications

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communications 1.00
be important in data communication 0.85
be needed in data communication 0.82
be necessary in study of communication 0.80
be important to telecommunications industry 0.78
be needed in networking 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(standard, be important in communications)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)