algorithm: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
is used for 0.94
is used more 0.88
be utilized 0.86
is least used 0.79
be used building 0.79
utilized by fast-food restaurants 0.76
be used in research 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(computer program, is used for)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, is least used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(method, be utilized)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(computer program, is used for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(method, is least used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer program, is used for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(method, is least used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be used building)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be used in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(computer program, is used for)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, is least used)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(triangulation, be used building)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be used building)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(triangulation, be used in research)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be used in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(algorithm, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer program, is used for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, is least used)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(triangulation, be used building)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(triangulation, be used in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer program, is used for)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, is least used)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(algorithm, be used)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)