method: be utilized

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be utilized 1.00
be used 0.86
is is used 0.81
is used for 0.80
have have used 0.78
is used more 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(method, be utilized)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(method, be utilized)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(method, be utilized)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(method, be utilized)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(method, is used more)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be utilized)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(method, be utilized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)